Built for Financial-crime, risk and fraud leaders buried in false positives and unable to explain their models.
Signals are combined to surface genuine anomalies, tuned to your loss profile rather than a generic default.
Every alert comes with the reasons it fired, so an investigator can act in minutes, not hours.
Alerts are ranked by expected loss and confidence, concentrating attention where it pays.
Investigator feedback and new patterns feed back into the model under change control.
Indicative ranges drawn from comparable engagements, measured against a pre-AI baseline. Your figures are set and tracked from your own data during delivery.
Every engagement hands over working software in your repositories, with the evidence to run and audit it.
Yes. Every alert carries the factors that drove it, and the model ships with an audit pack and a versioned evaluation harness. Explainability is a design requirement here, not a feature added after the fact.
Investigator feedback and emerging patterns feed back into the model under change control, with each change regression-tested on the evaluation harness so a fix for one pattern does not quietly break detection of another.