Built for Payer and provider operations leaders facing prior-authorisation volumes, timelines and the 2026-27 electronic-PA mandates.
Relevant clinical evidence and the applicable medical policy are assembled for each request.
On the provider side, the submission is drafted from the evidence for clinician review.
Clear approvals are surfaced quickly; only genuine exceptions consume clinician time.
A licensed clinician owns every denial, with the full evidence and policy in front of them.
Indicative ranges drawn from comparable engagements, measured against a pre-AI baseline. Your figures are set and tracked from your own data during delivery.
Every engagement hands over working software in your repositories, with the evidence to run and audit it.
The design supports electronic prior authorisation and decision-timeline reporting in line with the CMS rules phasing in through 2026 and 2027, and keeps a licensed clinician on every adverse determination as several states now require.
The AI attacks the administrative burden - evidence gathering and drafting - not the clinical decision. Approvals can be accelerated; denials are always a human clinical judgement. That boundary is the whole governance posture.